John Eastman joined the Ingraham Angle last night to discuss executive privilege; NYTimes collusion with FBI on the Jared Kushner meetings; and yesterday’s Nadler Committee hearing on the Mueller report.
Paul and Olivia discuss a bevy of political and philosophical topics with Michael Anton, former Deputy Assistant to President Trump for Strategic Communications and author of After the Flight 93 Election: The Vote that Saved America and What We Still Have to Lose. In this interview, we explore questions about President Trump and modern conservatism, how the Republican Party must move away from its market fundamentalism, the challenges posed by big tech and modern technology, and the philosophical roots of the current political crisis.
Matthew Peterson joins Michael Alexander on Radio Free LA "The Answer" to discuss The Claremont Institute and the launching of The American Mind; Conservatism Inc.'s failure to take bold moves; and the liberal monopoly on education.
Charles Kesler, Mark Lilla, Heather Mac Donald, and Ryan Williams examine the political and moral threat of identity politics and the means necessary to reinstate and protect the motto on which our republic stands: e pluribus unum.
Judge Edith Jones accepts the Claremont Institute's 2017 Jurisprudence Award.
The Claremont Institute commemorated the 230th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution with panel discussions addressing some of the most pressing threats to our constitutional system.
The Claremont Institute commemorated the 230th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution with panel discussions addressing some of the most pressing threats to our constitutional system. Panel 1: "Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Future of Religious Liberty."
The Claremont Institute commemorated the 230th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution with panel discussions addressing some of the most pressing threats to our constitutional system. Panel 2: The Administrative State and the New "Conservative" Majority on the Supreme Court.
The Claremont Institute commemorated the 230th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution with panel discussions addressing some of the most pressing threats to our constitutional system. Panel 3: Immigration, Citizenship, and the Trump Administration.
The Claremont Institute hosted Claremont Review of Books Editor Dr. Charles Kesler and Claremont Review of Books Senior Editor Dr. William Voegeli for a talk on “How to Think about the Trump Administration.”
The Claremont Institute and Federalist Society joined together for a two-part panel discussion to consider Justice Clarence Thomas's 25 years on the Supreme Court. Panel 2: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas: 25 Years on the Court: The Declaration as the Central Ideal in American Constitutionalism.
The Claremont Institute and Federalist Society hosted The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas: 25 Years on the Court. This two-part panel discussion considered Justice Clarence Thomas's quarter century on the Supreme Court. Panel 1: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas.
Dr. John Eastman, Founding Director of Claremont's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, joins McIntyre in the Morning to discuss a fascinating First Amendment question posed by a new California law.
Claremont Institute Senior Fellow and Claremont Review of Books Editor Charles Kesler joins "The Seth Leibsohn Show" to discuss the postmodern campus, conservatism's post-election future, and much more.
A Republican presidential field that was hailed as the most talented in a generation has been flummoxed, humbled, and finally beaten by Donald Trump. Whatever decision individual conservatives make come November, the time has come for the Right to reckon with what has happened.
The polls were right, and the pundits were wrong. A Republican presidential field that was hailed as the most talented in a generation has been flummoxed, humbled, and finally beaten by Donald Trump. The Party of Lincoln is now firmly in the hands of a Manhattan billionaire, and conservatives seem hopelessly divided about how to proceed.
When the first Civil Service Reform Act passed in 1883, “good government” reformers envisioned nonpartisan civil servants fairly administering the federal bureaucracy.The executive branch increasingly treats agencies like the IRS and the DOJ not as impartial regulators, but as partisan weapons for intimidating political opponents. Co-hosted with the Federalist Society.
When the first Civil Service Reform Act passed in 1883, “good government” reformers envisioned nonpartisan civil servants fairly administering the federal bureaucracy. From the vantage point of 2016, it is clear this dream has turned into a nightmare.
Judges must navigate between interpreting the Constitution and statutes, working within existing precedents and applying both bodies of law to particular cases. Striking this balance has policy consequences that render the Supreme Court a political branch in the public's mind. As the heated debate of Justice Antonin Scalia's replacement demonstrates, the Court is no longer seen as the "least dangerous branch."
How should justices address this tension in their decisions and opinions? Can the Court return to a narrower vision of its judicial duty? If not, what judicial philosophy best fits the reality of the Court's role in a self-governing republic?
Claremont's John Eastman joins an expert panel at the American Enterprise Institute to answer these questions and more. (Dr. Eastman's presentation begins at 65:09.)
This clip, from America’s Political Parties Part One: The Democrats, depicts what Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick calls “a landmark of political conflict in modern American history." The film was produced by Michael Pack, for Manifold Productions, Inc.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from two of the Supreme Court's recent cases—Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association and Sturgeon v. Frost.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from two of the term’s most important cases—Fisher v. University of Texas and Evenwel v. Abbott.
This year, the Supreme Court will have several chances to reevaluate the deference it has historically given the administrative state. The Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence is taking a particular interest in this fight to rein in the excesses of unaccountable agencies and help restore constitutional government.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, previews Fischer v. University of Texas at Austin, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, and Evenwel v. Abbott.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, discusses the Supreme Court's groundbreaking decisions in King v. Burwell and Obergefell v. Hodges. These cases illustrate the Roberts Court's troubling willingness to decide political questions properly left to the people.
Charles Kesler interviews Larry P. Arnn on the health of the health of the American Academy; liberal education and citizenship; the best regime; and why America can't operate within Constitutional limits.
Charles Kesler interviews John Eastman on the disappearing Constitution; natural law and the conservatives on the court; church, state, and religion as a public good; and the Constitution under attack.
Charles Kesler interviews Steven Hayward on the Age of Reagan; supply side economics; the Age of Reagan vs. the Age of Obama; the Age of Reagan and the Second American Revolution; and Communism and the Middle East.
Charles Kesler interviews Heather Mac Donald on her education; crime, immigration, and the rule of law; the insanity of higher education; from God and man to a secular society; and the past and future of classical music.
Charles Kesler interviews Christopher DeMuth on civil rights, neoconservatives, and problems without solutions; the rise of the administrative state; fighting the administrative state; the coming crisis of the national debt and deficit problem; and new institutions and the think tank phenomenon.
Charles Kesler interviews Mark Blitz on contemporary liberalism vs. natural rights; virtue and responsibility; excellence and education; self-government vs. the administrative state; and lessons from Reagan.
Charles Kesler interviews Charles Krauthammer on his education; Freud, Churchill, and Einstein; successes and failures in Iraq; the fate of modern liberalism; and the Democrat's failure to recognize evil.
Charles Kesler interviews Edward Erler on Brown vs. Board and separate but equal; the problem with birthright citizenship; the right to bear arms; citizens and citizenship; Leo Strauss; and Harry V. Jaffa.
Charles Kesler interviews John Marini on the Western and political thought; Westerns and the American story; President Nixon vs. the administrative state; individual rights vs. the administrative state; and the Constitution vs. the administrative state.
Charles Kesler interviews James Ceaser on the Founders & Our Current Presidential Election Process; Demagoguery in our Times; Class War and the 2012 Campaign; and The State of American Political Discourse.
Charles Kesler interviews Walter Russell Mead on the history of American liberalism; the blue model for economic recovery; the four schools of American foreign policy; and American foreign policy in the Middle East.
Steven Hayward interviews Charles Kesler on how liberalism is in a state of crisis; Obama's predecessors; Obama's liberalism; which former president does Obama most resemble; and the importance of Progressivism now.
Charles Kesler interviews Diana Schaub on the American experiment and its character; what black American writers have had to say on the subject; and the careers of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr.
For our April town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman is joined Professor Anthony Caso, Ilya Shapiro, and Lynne Marie Kohm. Dr. Eastman and his guests discuss two of the most hot-button cases before the Court: Horne v. USDA and Obergefell v. Hodges.
In Texas v. United States, Texas is joined by 25 other states fighting against the recent executive action to grant deferred deportation status to 4 million illegal immigrants. In Frank v. Walker, Wisconsin recently won the right to enforce its 2012 law requiring photo ID to vote. Dr. Eastman and his guests discuss the legal and political implications of these states' fights to restore the rule of law.
For our March town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by the Cato Institute's Ilya Shapiro and the Texas Public Policy Foundation's John Davidson to discuss the policy considerations and constitutional questions raised by King v. Burwell. Dr. Eastman is then joined by C.D. Michel to discuss Henderson v. United States. The case presents an interesting twist on Second Amendment rights.
On June 19, 2014, renowned legal scholar and former Bush Administration official John Yoo addressed supporters of the Claremont Institute at the Montage Hotel in Beverly Hills. He discussed the Constitution's vision of presidential powers and illustrated how the Obama Administration has turned the framers' design on its head.
Dr. Eastman is joined by Professor Anthony Caso and Karen R. Harned to discuss two cases recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that address the power and authority of the federal bureaucracy. At the core of each of these cases we debate what power is granted by the people to the entities involved and the limits of that power.
At this October 7 CRB Forum in New York City, Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Angelo Codevilla discusses strategy, foreign policy, and American security with David P. Goldman, author of the "Spengler" column for Asia Times Online and the "Spengler" blog at PJ Media. The occasion for the discussion is Goldman's review of Codevilla's recent book To Make and Keep Peace in the Claremont Review of Books.
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) received the Claremont Institute's 2014 Statesmanship Award at our Annual Dinner in Honor of Sir Winston Churchill on March 15, 2014. In his award acceptance speech, Senator Cruz discusses the past and future of Conservatism and the Republican Party.
Claremont Institute Washington Fellow Bill Bennett offers his remarks at the 2011 Dinner in Honor of Sir Winston Churchill. The event is hosted by the Claremont Institute in Newport Beach, CA. The 2011 Statesmanship Award went to Congressman Paul Ryan.
Dr. Larry Arnn offers his remarks at the 2011 Dinner in Honor of Sir Winston Churchill. The event is hosted by the Claremont Institute in Newport Beach, CA. The 2011 Statesmanship Award went to Congressman Paul Ryan.
The Claremont Institute is proud to welcome Congressman Paul Ryan, keynote speaker and recipient of the 2011 Statesmanship Award in Honor of Winston Churchill. These are Rep. Paul Ryan's remarks from the November 12, 2011 dinner held by the Claremont Institute in Newport Beach, CA.
Zachary Rogers is a graduate of UCCS, Hillsdale College, and the John Jay Institute. A former dean of students, college counselor, and teacher, he currently works for the American Council of Trustees and Alumni as a program officer
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.