Freedom of association is as essential to the university’s mission as freedom of speech.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by David W. Casazza and Denise Harle to discuss the Benisek v. Lamone followed by a discussion on NIFLA v. Becerra.
Dr. John C. Eastman and Ilya Shapiro discuss the Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky case. Later they discuss the Janus v. American Federation case, which questions whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education should be overruled.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Anastasia Boden to discuss the Murr v. Wisconsin case. Next he is joined by Michael Huston to discuss Matal v. Tam and Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman. Later Eastman is joined by Dr. Sohan Dasgupta to discuss the Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Ilya Shapiro to discuss the boundaries of freedom of speech. Later Eastman is joined by Richard Samp to discuss the cases Ziglar v. Abbasi and Lewis v. Clarke.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from two of the Supreme Court's recent cases—Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association and Sturgeon v. Frost.