Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by a panel with Professor John Yoo, William Huan, Marcella Burke, and Michael Huston to discuss the final opinions of the Court's 2015-16 term.
The Bill of Rights on Trial: Free Speech, Commerce, and the Fourth Amendment
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Ilya Shapiro to discuss the boundaries of freedom of speech. Later Eastman is joined by Richard Samp to discuss the cases Ziglar v. Abbasi and Lewis v. Clarke.
Dr. John C. Eastman is Founding Director of the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, and currently serves as the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University’s Dale E. Fowler School of Law. He is also a Senior Fellow of the Claremont Institute.
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Richard Samp is Chief Counsel for the Washington Legal Foundation.
The American Mind presents a range of perspectives. Views are writers’ own and do not necessarily represent those of The Claremont Institute.
The American Mind is a publication of the Claremont Institute, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, dedicated to restoring the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life. Interested in supporting our work? Gifts to the Claremont Institute are tax-deductible.
Suggested reading
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by David W. Casazza and Denise Harle to discuss the Benisek v. Lamone followed by a discussion on NIFLA v. Becerra.
Tom Klingenstein joins Peter Wood to discuss a variety of subjects including higher education, Abraham Lincoln, the founders, multiculturalism, and a "The Golf Shot Heard Round the World."
Dr. John C. Eastman and Ilya Shapiro discuss the Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky case. Later they discuss the Janus v. American Federation case, which questions whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education should be overruled.
Dr. Eastman, Roger Clegg, and Gene C. Schaerr discuss how will the Court address allegations of housing discrimination and violations of free speech?
