Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Michael Lieberman to discuss Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. Harris. Later Eastman is joined by Kevin Johnson to discuss Jennings v. Rodriguez.
CCJ Townhall
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by John Elwood to discuss the limits of the president's appointment authority and the impact of the 2016 election in the future of the judiciary.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Jay Feinberg and Trent England to discuss the 17th Amendment.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by a panel with Professor John Yoo, William Huan, Marcella Burke, and Michael Huston to discuss the final opinions of the Court's 2015-16 term.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Jeffrey Harris to discuss Encino Motorcars, L.L.C. v. Navarro. Later he is joined by John Miano to discuss United States v. Texas.
Dr. John C. Eastman is joined by Professor Anthony T. Caso to discuss the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes. Later Eastman is joined by Ilya Shapiro to discuss Zubik v. Burwell.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from two of the Supreme Court's recent cases—Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association and Sturgeon v. Frost.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, takes a look at the oral arguments from two of the term’s most important cases—Fisher v. University of Texas and Evenwel v. Abbott.
This year, the Supreme Court will have several chances to reevaluate the deference it has historically given the administrative state. The Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence is taking a particular interest in this fight to rein in the excesses of unaccountable agencies and help restore constitutional government.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, previews Fischer v. University of Texas at Austin, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, and Evenwel v. Abbott.
In this town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, discusses the Supreme Court's groundbreaking decisions in King v. Burwell and Obergefell v. Hodges. These cases illustrate the Roberts Court's troubling willingness to decide political questions properly left to the people.
