Video
1:07:47

John Eastman, Senior Fellow of the Claremont Institute, debates Michael Gerhardt on whether or not the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its original public meaning at the Heritage Foundation.

Heritage Foundation description of event:

Over three decades ago, then-Attorney General Ed Meese initiated an important spirited national debate about the proper application of our most important governing document—the U.S. Constitution. Since then, Originalism has emerged as a serious theory of constitutional interpretation that has permeated the judiciary and the academy. Originalists believe that the Constitution and laws should be interpreted based on their actual text and original public meaning. Conversely, proponents of a “Living Constitution,” stress the need to adapt the Constitution “to cope with current problems and current needs.”

These two theories will go head-to-head in a spirited debate with two well-known constitutional scholars, John Eastman and Michael Gerhardt.

video
10:48

Rebeccah Heinrichs joins the Oxford Union 7.30.19

Rebeccah Heinrichs argues that Trump's foreign policy is preferable to Obama's foreign policy.

video
2:58

Dr. Charles Kesler joins “Life, Liberty & Levin” 7.21.19

Dr. Charles Kesler joins Mark Levin on "Life, Liberty & Levin" to discuss political correctness and its intolerance for the moral imperfection of fellow Americans.

video
5:04

Gil Barndollar joins “Tucker Carlson Tonight” 7.19.19

Gil Barndollar joins "Tucker Carlson Tonight" to analyze the latest push for war with Iran.