The Claremont Institute hosted Claremont Review of Books Editor Dr. Charles Kesler and Claremont Review of Books Senior Editor Dr. William Voegeli for a talk on “How to Think about the Trump Administration.”
Debating the Trump Presidency
Charles Kesler and Jonah Goldberg Debate the Trump Presidency
Claremont Senior Fellow and Editor of the Claremont Review of Books, Charles R. Kesler debates Jonah Goldberg on the Trump Presidency at the University of Notre Dame, hosted by Vincent Philip Muñoz and the Constitutional Studies Department. For more, read Kesler’s essay, Thinking About Trump, from the Spring, 2018 issue of the Claremont Review of Books.
The American Mind presents a range of perspectives. Views are writers’ own and do not necessarily represent those of The Claremont Institute.
The American Mind is a publication of the Claremont Institute, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, dedicated to restoring the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life. Interested in supporting our work? Gifts to the Claremont Institute are tax-deductible.
The Claremont Institute hosted "Conservatism in the Trump Era," a two-part panel discussing the future of conservatism. Panel 2: Conservativism in the Trump Era: Recovering American Conservatism.
The Claremont Institute hosted "Conservatism in the Trump Era," a two-part panel discussing the future of conservatism. Panel 1: Conservativism in the Trump Era: American Statecraft.
The polls were right, and the pundits were wrong. A Republican presidential field that was hailed as the most talented in a generation has been flummoxed, humbled, and finally beaten by Donald Trump. The Party of Lincoln is now firmly in the hands of a Manhattan billionaire, and conservatives seem hopelessly divided about how to proceed.
Dr. John Eastman joins Mark Levin on "Life, Liberty, & Levin" to discuss the problems with obstruction of justice claims emerging from Part II of the Mueller Report.
Rebeccah Heinrichs argues that Trump's foreign policy is preferable to Obama's foreign policy.